Philemon 8-12


8 Accordingly, though I am bold enough in Christ to command you to do what is required, 9 yet for love’s sake I prefer to appeal to you—I, Paul, an old man and now a prisoner also for Christ Jesus—10 I appeal to you for my child, Onesimus, whose father I became in my imprisonment. 11 (Formerly he was useless to you, but now he is indeed useful to you and to me.) 12 I am sending him back to you, sending my very heart.

“What is the right thing to do?” It is a question that everybody has had to ask themselves and it is a question, collectively, that we ask of nations and institutions and even churches in given situations. “What is the right thing to do?” The question assumes, of course, that there is such a thing as “the right thing to do.” In our day such an assumption is no longer automatic. In our day we are as likely to view actions as “one right thing among other right things” or even in terms of actions being ethically neutral. We are even tempted to believe that there is no “right” or “wrong” by which we can judge actions at all.

For instance, the late John Stott critiqued Abraham Edel in 2010. Edel argued that there was no ultimate right or wrong.

This viewpoint was critically evaluated by the distinguished American moral and social philosopher Abraham Edel (1908-2007), whose first major book was titled Ethical Judgment, and subtitled The Use of Science in Ethics. “Morality is ultimately arbitrary,” he wrote, and went on with a piece of popular doggerel:

It all depends on where you are,

It all depends on when you are,

It all depends on what you feel.

It all depends on how you feel.

It all depends on how you’re raised

It all depends on what is praised,

What’s right today is wrong tomorrow,

Joy in France, in England sorrow.

It all depends on point of view,

Australia or Timbuctoo,

In Rome do as the Romans do.

If tastes just happen to agree

Then you have morality.

But when there are conflicting trends,

It all depends, it all depends.[1]

Maybe we could view that concluding statement as the mantra of this confused age in which we live: “It all depends, it all depends!”

Continue reading

Job 28

Job 28

1 “Surely there is a mine for silver, and a place for gold that they refine. Iron is taken out of the earth, and copper is smelted from the ore.Man puts an end to darkness and searches out to the farthest limit the ore in gloom and deep darkness.He opens shafts in a valley away from where anyone lives; they are forgotten by travelers; they hang in the air, far away from mankind; they swing to and fro.As for the earth, out of it comes bread, but underneath it is turned up as by fire.Its stones are the place of sapphires, and it has dust of gold.“That path no bird of prey knows, and the falcon’s eye has not seen it.The proud beasts have not trodden it; the lion has not passed over it.“Man puts his hand to the flinty rock and overturns mountains by the roots. 10 He cuts out channels in the rocks, and his eye sees every precious thing. 11 He dams up the streams so that they do not trickle, and the thing that is hidden he brings out to light. 12 “But where shall wisdom be found? And where is the place of understanding? 13 Man does not know its worth, and it is not found in the land of the living. 14 The deep says, ‘It is not in me,’ and the sea says, ‘It is not with me.’ 15 It cannot be bought for gold, and silver cannot be weighed as its price. 16 It cannot be valued in the gold of Ophir, in precious onyx or sapphire. 17 Gold and glass cannot equal it, nor can it be exchanged for jewels of fine gold. 18 No mention shall be made of coral or of crystal; the price of wisdom is above pearls. 19 The topaz of Ethiopia cannot equal it, nor can it be valued in pure gold. 20 “From where, then, does wisdom come? And where is the place of understanding? 21 It is hidden from the eyes of all living and concealed from the birds of the air. 22 Abaddon and Death say, ‘We have heard a rumor of it with our ears.’ 23 “God understands the way to it, and he knows its place. 24 For he looks to the ends of the earth and sees everything under the heavens. 25 When he gave to the wind its weight and apportioned the waters by measure, 26 when he made a decree for the rain and a way for the lightning of the thunder, 27 then he saw it and declared it; he established it, and searched it out. 28 And he said to man, ‘Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding.’”

One of the most unsettling films I have ever seen is Paul Thomas Anderson’s 2007 movie, “There Will Be Blood,” which is a film adaptation of Upton Sinclair’s 1926-1927 novel, Oil!. The film version is visually and psychologically jarring. It follows the rise of oilman Daniel Plainview from his meager beginnings mining for gold and then digging for oil in the dug-out pits of the western United States deserts to his eventual rise to wealthy oil tycoon to his final descent into madness. There is a fascinating story surrounding Plainview, but Plainview’s character takes center stage.

The opening shot of the film and the closing shot of the film present us with a shocking contrast. The opening shot is a stark panoramic of a bleak desert wilderness which appears to us in the film accompanied by a growing and discordant symphonic accompaniment that itself portends great dread. It is here in this wilderness that poor Daniel Plainview is in a hole beneath the earth mining for gold. The final shot is of a raving, disheveled Plainview sitting in one of the lanes of the bowling alley in his huge mansion beside a man who he has just bludgeoned to death with a bowling pin.

Needless to say, it is not a feel-good movie! But as a depiction of human depravity and, in particular, as a depiction of one central point, it is a genius film. Here is that point: one may grow wealthy by mining and drilling in the belly of the earth and yet miss the greatest treasure of all: wisdom.

Continue reading

Mark 3:20-21,31-35

MarkSeriesTitleSlide1Mark 3

20 Then he went home, and the crowd gathered again, so that they could not even eat. 21 And when his family heard it, they went out to seize him, for they were saying, “He is out of his mind.”

31 And his mother and his brothers came, and standing outside they sent to him and called him. 32 And a crowd was sitting around him, and they said to him, “Your mother and your brothers are outside, seeking you.” 33 And he answered them, “Who are my mother and my brothers?” 34 And looking about at those who sat around him, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers! 35 For whoever does the will of God, he is my brother and sister and mother.”

I think one of the greatest old Twilight Zone episodes ever to air was entitled “Eye of the Beholder.” Perhaps you will remember this episode. It begins with a woman in a hospital bed. She is referred to throughout the episode as “patient 307.” Her face is completely obscured by the bandages wrapped around her entire head. She talks with a nurse who is attending her and the conversation turns to her face under the bandages and what it will look like when they remove the wrappings.

Continue reading

Philemon 4-7


4 I thank my God always when I remember you in my prayers, 5 because I hear of your love and of the faith that you have toward the Lord Jesus and for all the saints, 6 and I pray that the sharing of your faith may become effective for the full knowledge of every good thing that is in us for the sake of Christ. 7 For I have derived much joy and comfort from your love, my brother, because the hearts of the saints have been refreshed through you.

Fyodor Dostoevsky wrote this about flattery in Crime and Punishment:

It’s the well-known resource – flattery. Nothing in the world is harder than speaking the truth and nothing easier than flattery. If there’s the hundredth part of a false note in speaking the truth, it leads to a discord, and that leads to trouble. But if all, to the last note, is false in flattery, it is just as agreeable, and is heard not without satisfaction. It may be a coarse satisfaction, but still a satisfaction. And however coarse the flattery, at least half will be sure to seem true. That’s so for all stages of development and classes of society. A vestal virgin might be seduced by flattery.[1]

Dostoevsky is correct: flattery is a powerful, powerful thing!

Continue reading

Job 27

elifas-o-job-2xsepJob 27

1 And Job again took up his discourse, and said: 2 “As God lives, who has taken away my right, and the Almighty, who has made my soul bitter, 3 as long as my breath is in me, and the spirit of God is in my nostrils, 4 my lips will not speak falsehood, and my tongue will not utter deceit. 5 Far be it from me to say that you are right; till I die I will not put away my integrity from me. 6 I hold fast my righteousness and will not let it go; my heart does not reproach me for any of my days. 7 “Let my enemy be as the wicked, and let him who rises up against me be as the unrighteous. 8 For what is the hope of the godless when God cuts him off, when God takes away his life? 9 Will God hear his cry when distress comes upon him? 10 Will he take delight in the Almighty? Will he call upon God at all times? 11 I will teach you concerning the hand of God; what is with the Almighty I will not conceal. 12 Behold, all of you have seen it yourselves; why then have you become altogether vain? 13 “This is the portion of a wicked man with God, and the heritage that oppressors receive from the Almighty: 14 If his children are multiplied, it is for the sword, and his descendants have not enough bread. 15 Those who survive him the pestilence buries, and his widows do not weep. 16 Though he heap up silver like dust, and pile up clothing like clay, 17 he may pile it up, but the righteous will wear it, and the innocent will divide the silver. 18 He builds his house like a moth’s, like a booth that a watchman makes. 19 He goes to bed rich, but will do so no more; he opens his eyes, and his wealth is gone. 20 Terrors overtake him like a flood; in the night a whirlwind carries him off. 21 The east wind lifts him up and he is gone; it sweeps him out of his place. 22 It hurls at him without pity; he flees from its power in headlong flight. 23 It claps its hands at him and hisses at him from its place.

Francis Chan has offered an interesting illustration that pertains to hypocrisy and to integrity.

Recently I saw a bag of potato chips with a bold declaration splashed across the front: “Zero grams of trans fat.” I was glad to know that I wouldn’t be consuming trans fat, which research has shown is detrimental to my health. But then I flipped the bag over and read the ingredients list, which included things like “yellow #6” and other artificial colors, and partially hydrogenated oil (which is trans fat, just a small enough amount that they can legally call it “0 grams”). I thought it was incredibly ironic that these chips were being advertised in a way that makes me think they are not harmful yet were really full of empty calories, weird chemicals, and, ironically, trans fat.

            It struck me that many Christians flash around their “no trans fat” label, trying to convince everyone they are healthy and good. Yet they have no substantive or healthful elements to their faith…Obviously, it’s not what you advertise that counts; it’s what you are really made of.[1]

One might say that the book of Job consists of Job’s “friends” accusing him of being like that bag of potato chips and of Job responding that, in point of fact, what was on the inside was exactly what was advertised on the outside. Job’s friends insisted that he must have had some hidden “trans fats.” Job again and again insisted that he did not.

Continue reading

Job 25-26

jobblackwhiteJob 25

1 Then Bildad the Shuhite answered and said: “Dominion and fear are with God; he makes peace in his high heaven.Is there any number to his armies? Upon whom does his light not arise?How then can man be in the right before God? How can he who is born of woman be pure?Behold, even the moon is not bright, and the stars are not pure in his eyes;how much less man, who is a maggot, and the son of man, who is a worm!”

Job 26

1 Then Job answered and said: “How you have helped him who has no power! How you have saved the arm that has no strength! How you have counseled him who has no wisdom, and plentifully declared sound knowledge! With whose help have you uttered words, and whose breath has come out from you? The dead tremble under the waters and their inhabitants. Sheol is naked before God, and Abaddon has no covering. He stretches out the north over the void and hangs the earth on nothing. He binds up the waters in his thick clouds, and the cloud is not split open under them. He covers the face of the full moon and spreads over it his cloud. 10 He has inscribed a circle on the face of the waters at the boundary between light and darkness. 11 The pillars of heaven tremble and are astounded at his rebuke. 12 By his power he stilled the sea; by his understanding he shattered Rahab. 13 By his wind the heavens were made fair; his hand pierced the fleeing serpent. 14 Behold, these are but the outskirts of his ways, and how small a whisper do we hear of him! But the thunder of his power who can understand?”

Erasmus of Rotterdam is still recognized as one of the truly great minds ever to appear on the earth. A prodigious scholar, Erasmus took a degree in theology, though theology was but one of his many pursuits. Furthermore, he was not overly thrilled with taking a degree in theology and claims that he did so only because his friends pushed him in to it. Continue reading

Philemon 1-3


1 Paul, a prisoner for Christ Jesus, and Timothy our brother, To Philemon our beloved fellow worker 2 and Apphia our sister and Archippus our fellow soldier, and the church in your house: 3 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

In 1642, Blaise Pascal, at the age of nineteen, started working on building a mechanical calculator, primarily in order to help his father with his business as a tax commissioner. The calculator came to be known as “the pascaline.” This invention was significant for a number of reasons, as Wikipedia explains:

Besides being the first calculating machine made public during its time, the pascaline is also:

  • the only operational mechanical calculator in the 17th century.
  • the first calculator to have a controlled carry mechanism that allowed for an effective propagation of multiple carries
  • the first calculator to be used in an office (his father’s to compute taxes)
  • the first calculator commercialized (with around twenty machines built)
  • the first calculator to be patented (royal privilege of 1649)
  • the first calculator to be described in an encyclopedia (Diderot & d’Alembert, 1751)
  • the first calculator sold by a distributor[1]

Jean-Claude Carriere has told the story of how a man he knows discovered one of Pascal’s calculators.

I also knew a superb bookseller in the rue de l’Universite,’ who specialized in scientific books and objects…He lived on the rue du Bac, on the other side of boulevard Saint-Germain. One night he was walking home up the rue de Bac. He crossed the boulevard and, as he was walking along, he noticed a small piece of brass poking out of a rubbish bin. He stopped, lifted the lid, went through the bin and pulled out one of the twelve calculators made by Pascal himself. Absolutely priceless. It now lives in the National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts, the CNAM. Who had thrown it out?[2]

Continue reading

Mark 3:1-6

MarkSeriesTitleSlide1Mark 3

1 Again he entered the synagogue, and a man was there with a withered hand. 2 And they watched Jesus, to see whether he would heal him on the Sabbath, so that they might accuse him. 3 And he said to the man with the withered hand, “Come here.” 4 And he said to them, “Is it lawful on the Sabbath to do good or to do harm, to save life or to kill?” But they were silent. 5 And he looked around at them with anger, grieved at their hardness of heart, and said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He stretched it out, and his hand was restored. 6 The Pharisees went out and immediately held counsel with the Herodians against him, how to destroy him.

Some time back, our staff read through Eric Metaxas’ very interesting book Miracles as a devotional exercise. He begins his book with a most interesting quotation.

In a 2013 article in The New Yorker about faith and belief, Adam Gopnik wrote the following: “We know that…in the billions of years of the universe’s existence, there is no evidence of a single miraculous intercession (sic) with the laws of nature.”…In the article, Gopnik continues: “We need not imagine that there’s no Heaven; we know that there is none, and we will search for angels forever in vain.

Continue reading

Job 24

Job-SufferingJob 24

1 “Why are not times of judgment kept by the Almighty, and why do those who know him never see his days? 2 Some move landmarks; they seize flocks and pasture them. 3 They drive away the donkey of the fatherless; they take the widow’s ox for a pledge. 4 They thrust the poor off the road; the poor of the earth all hide themselves. 5 Behold, like wild donkeys in the desert the poor go out to their toil, seeking game; the wasteland yields food for their children. 6 They gather their fodder in the field, and they glean the vineyard of the wicked man. 7 They lie all night naked, without clothing, and have no covering in the cold. 8 They are wet with the rain of the mountains and cling to the rock for lack of shelter. 9 (There are those who snatch the fatherless child from the breast, and they take a pledge against the poor.) 10 They go about naked, without clothing; hungry, they carry the sheaves; 11 among the olive rows of the wicked they make oil; they tread the winepresses, but suffer thirst. 12 From out of the city the dying groan, and the soul of the wounded cries for help; yet God charges no one with wrong. 13 “There are those who rebel against the light, who are not acquainted with its ways, and do not stay in its paths. 14 The murderer rises before it is light, that he may kill the poor and needy, and in the night he is like a thief. 15 The eye of the adulterer also waits for the twilight, saying, ‘No eye will see me’; and he veils his face. 16 In the dark they dig through houses; by day they shut themselves up; they do not know the light. 17 For deep darkness is morning to all of them; for they are friends with the terrors of deep darkness. 18 “You say, ‘Swift are they on the face of the waters; their portion is cursed in the land; no treader turns toward their vineyards. 19 Drought and heat snatch away the snow waters; so does Sheol those who have sinned. 20 The womb forgets them; the worm finds them sweet; they are no longer remembered, so wickedness is broken like a tree.’ 21 “They wrong the barren, childless woman, and do no good to the widow. 22 Yet God prolongs the life of the mighty by his power; they rise up when they despair of life. 23 He gives them security, and they are supported, and his eyes are upon their ways. 24 They are exalted a little while, and then are gone; they are brought low and gathered up like all others; they are cut off like the heads of grain. 25 If it is not so, who will prove me a liar and show that there is nothing in what I say?”

On his 2003 American V album, Johnny Cash recorded and made famous his own version of the an old song entitled, “God’s Gonna Cut You Down.” Wikipedia says that the song has sold 672,000 copies as of January of 2016. A unique and stark video of Cash’s rendition of the song aided its popularity. The lyrics speak to the human desire for the wicked to be punished and our sense that ultimately they will be.

Continue reading

Mark 2:23-28

MarkSeriesTitleSlide1Mark 2

23 One Sabbath he was going through the grainfields, and as they made their way, his disciples began to pluck heads of grain. 24 And the Pharisees were saying to him, “Look, why are they doing what is not lawful on the Sabbath?” 25 And he said to them, “Have you never read what David did, when he was in need and was hungry, he and those who were with him: 26 how he entered the house of God, in the time of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the bread of the Presence, which it is not lawful for any but the priests to eat, and also gave it to those who were with him?” 27 And he said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. 28 So the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath.”

The first years of marriage are years filled with fascinating discoveries! Once, as a young husband, I took a shirt to my wife on a Saturday afternoon and told her that the front of the shirt was missing two buttons. I shared with her that I was very much wanting to wear the shirt the next morning to church where I would be preaching. I asked if she could sow two buttons on the front and she happily agreed.

The next morning, Sunday, I put on the newly repaired and recently ironed shirt. I smiled when I went to button the shirt and realized that my beautiful bride could sew! The two buttons on the front of the shirt lined up perfectly with the buttonholes. I buttoned up the shirt, grabbed a tie, raised my collar, tied it, put the collar down again…and then went to button my collar

It took me a moment to figure out why my two collar buttons were missing, but I did indeed figure it out.

I called Roni into the room and said, “Dear, you did a wonderful job with this shirt.”

“Why, thank you,” she responded.

“There’s just one thing I’m curious about, though.”


“Where,” I asked, “did you get the two buttons to fix my shirt.”

She paused and smiled. “From your collar.”

We still laugh about this to this day, over twenty years later.

There is a way to fix a problem without ever fixing the problem. Sometimes we might even feel that this is a good metaphor for life. A lot of us spend a lot of time just moving the buttons around on the shirt. But moving the buttons around really does not solve anything if you still do not have enough buttons!

There is a general principle here, to be sure, but there is also a religious principle. In fact, we might define “religion” as the human construction of sacred ceremonies in which buttons are moved around in a most solemn and ritualistic manner. Religion, in other words, is doing something and it is even trying to address real issues, but, in and of itself, religion does not really fix anything.

The Pharisees were official button movers. They were very concerned about where the buttons should go but were nonetheless blind to the fact that they were still dealing with an insufficient number of buttons. Jesus, on the other hand, did not come to move buttons but rather to gives us a whole new outfit! He came to dress us anew, not patch us up.

The difference between what Jesus was doing and is doing and what the Pharisees were doing is nowhere clearer than in our intriguing passage.

The Pharisees allowed the outward forms of religion to blind them to the heart of God.

Once again, Jesus is in conflict with the religious establishment, this time not because of something He was not doing (i.e., fasting), but because of something his disciples were doing.

23 One Sabbath he was going through the grain fields, and as they made their way, his disciples began to pluck heads of grain. 24 And the Pharisees were saying to him, “Look, why are they doing what is not lawful on the Sabbath?”

There is a cultural disconnect here that we need to try to tackle. Why were the Pharisees so very upset at Jesus’ disciples plucking heads of grain? We need to understand that the primary problem was not what they were doing but when they were doing it. They were plucking heads of grain on the Sabbath. Therein lay the scandal. William Barclay has offered some helpful background information.

On any ordinary day the disciples were doing what was freely permitted (Exodus 23:24). So long as the traveler did not put a sickle into the field he was free to pluck the corn. But, this was done on the Sabbath and the Sabbath was hedged around with literally thousands of petty rules and regulations. All work was forbidden. Work had been classified under thirty-nine different heads and four of these heads were, reaping, winnowing, threshing and preparing a meal. By their action the disciples had technically broken all these four rules, and they were to be classified as lawbreakers. It seems fantastic to us; but to the Jewish rabbis it was a matter of deadly sin and of life and death.[1]

So Jesus and His disciples were colliding with the sacred conventions of the day. They were, in the eyes of the Pharisees, violating the sacred Sabbath. Danny Akin points out, Jesus’ “crime” here was two-fold: (1) “they were traveling, which was defined as walking more than 1,999 paces” and (2) they were “reaping,” which appeared to violate Exodus 34:21 in which we read that “you must rest on the seventh day, you must even rest during plowing and harvesting.” “Plucking,” Akin tells us, “was considered ‘harvesting’ in the eyes of the Pharisees.”[2]

In response to the outrage of the Pharisees, Jesus told them a Bible story.

25 And he said to them, “Have you never read what David did, when he was in need and was hungry, he and those who were with him: 26 how he entered the house of God, in the time of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the bread of the Presence, which it is not lawful for any but the priests to eat, and also gave it to those who were with him?”

We should first recognize a kind of delicious irony in the fact that Jesus quoted the scriptures to the Pharisees. Were these not the religious experts? Did they not know this scripture? Or did they know it without really knowing it? There is a subtle indictment in the fact that Jesus appealed to the Bible against the Pharisees: those who claimed to know so much were forgetting their own area of supposed expertise.

The story Jesus told them came from 1 Samuel 21. There, David was fleeing murderous Saul who wanted to destroy him. Here is the passage to which Jesus alludes:

1 Then David came to Nob to Ahimelech the priest. And Ahimelech came to meet David trembling and said to him, “Why are you alone, and no one with you?” 2 And David said to Ahimelech the priest, “The king has charged me with a matter and said to me, ‘Let no one know anything of the matter about which I send you, and with which I have charged you.’ I have made an appointment with the young men for such and such a place. 3 Now then, what do you have on hand? Give me five loaves of bread, or whatever is here.” 4 And the priest answered David, “I have no common bread on hand, but there is holy bread—if the young men have kept themselves from women.” 5 And David answered the priest, “Truly women have been kept from us as always when I go on an expedition. The vessels of the young men are holy even when it is an ordinary journey. How much more today will their vessels be holy?” 6 So the priest gave him the holy bread, for there was no bread there but the bread of the Presence, which is removed from before the Lord, to be replaced by hot bread on the day it is taken away. 7 Now a certain man of the servants of Saul was there that day, detained before the Lord. His name was Doeg the Edomite, the chief of Saul’s herdsmen.

David and his men ate “the bread of the Presence” or “the showbread.” Camille Focant explains that “the loaves of showbread are twelve flour cakes one put as an offering before Yahweh as a perpetual covenant. At its renewal each Sabbath, the old bread was taken away and it could only be consumed by the priests (Lev 24:5-9).”[3]

In other words, Jesus appeals to a story in which the great David, “a man after God’s own heart” (Acts 13:22), ate the sacred bread that belonged to God. David, too, had therefore violated the customary understanding of the sacred.

Why did Jesus tell them this story? He did so in order to make a point by paralleling the two situations. Like David and His men, Jesus was operating in the will of God and while the conventions designed to protect the sacred had been violate, the sacred itself had actually not been violated. Why? Because the heart of the law is the glory of God and His blessing of His people, and this cannot be contained in mere legalisms. How, in other words, did it violate the law for David, the man destined to be King, to feed himself and his men on sacred bread in a moment of necessity while fleeing murderous Saul? Was not the greater good in that case the survival of David? Did it not please God more that His chosen one should survive than that the customs be literally upheld?

And what of Jesus and His men? Did it not please God more, and, in so doing, honor the entire point of the Sabbath more, for Jesus and His men to be nourished, strengthened, and comforted in their Kingdom mission by eating the heads of grain than by them not doing so and remaining hungry in an effort to honor the conventions and rules? If the point of the Sabbath is rest for weary humanity and honor for God, then what could achieve that point better than that God’s Son and His chosen disciples should eat and be nourished on this most sacred of days?

“You can know the law by heart,” writes Philip Yancey, “without knowing the heart of it.”[4] Indeed! And this seems to be what had happened with the Pharisees. So concerned were they with the outward forms of religion that they had grown blind to the very heart of God! What Jesus was doing did not look right to them only because they could no longer see rightly!

This is the danger of religion. This is the danger of legalism, which is a disproportionate emphasis on the forms and mechanics of religion. This is empty religiosity: to begrudge hungry men their food because they were violating the religious customs.

J.C. Ryle, the famed 19th century Anglican bishop of Liverpool, observed of our text that, “we see from these verses what excessive importance is attached to trifles by those who merely observe the external forms of religion.”

            Let us watch and pray lest we fall into the errors of the Pharisees. There are never lacking Christians who walk in their steps. There are thousands at the present time who plainly think more of the mere outward ceremonies of religion than of its doctrines…It ought to be a settled principle in our minds that someone’s soul is in a bad state when they begin to regard human rites and ceremonies as things of superior importance, and exalt them above the preaching of the Gospel. It is a symptom of spiritual disease. There is mischief within.[5]

What most angers you and what most pleases you? When a person is in church but they are not dressed as nicely as you personally think they should be, which wins out: (a) anger at their violation of sartorial custom or (b) joy that they are here at all! What legalisms are possibly blinding you? Just how important are the outward forms of religion to you? How focused are you on the ritualistic element of what we do, the ceremonial, the external?

I am not arguing that there is not a place for ceremony in our lives together, but I am arguing that there is no place for the merely ceremonial and there is never a place for any external rite that would blind us to who God is, to what our purpose is, and to what it is that God is doing here with us and among us.

Legalism is a powerful thing! “Beware the leaven of the Pharisees” (Matthew 16:6).

The Pharisees allowed their religion to blind them to the reality that, in Jesus, the God whose honor they were seeking to protect was standing right in front of them.

There is indeed a scandal here, but the real scandal is not what Jesus and His disciples were doing. The real scandal was in the shocking ignorance of the Pharisees concerning who exactly it was that they were trying to connect. In fact, the Pharisees allowed their religion to blind them to the reality that, in Jesus, the God whose honor they were seeking to protect was standing right in front of them.

27 And he said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. 28 So the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath.”

Here again is rich irony: the Pharisees were standing before God trying to correct God in their effort to honor God!

Jesus makes two statements. The first is, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.” We might paraphrase this as, “God did not give us this day so man would be burdened with an impossible ideal to which he must labor and strive. God gave us this day so that His creation might be blessed and man might rest.” John Donahue notes that verses 27 and 28 form “a perfect chiasm: (A) Sabbath, (B) humankind, (B’) humankind, (A’) Sabbath” and that “the device rhetorically stresses the primacy of the human person…over the Sabbath, and prepares for the subsequent “Son of Man”…saying.”[6] That is really quite interesting and highlights the point: while all of creation, including the Sabbath, should have the glory of God as its primary focus, it is indisputably true that God is most glorified in the Sabbath when His creation receives the rest and restoration that He intends for us to receive from it. Thus, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.”

The Pharisees had distorted the Sabbath into a kind of theoretical thing before which men should tremble and fear. Into this fear, the Pharisees poured their countless rules and strictures. As such, the Sabbath was perverted by them into an ominous thing. But God intended for man to be blessed in the Sabbath! As such, the disciples picking grain in the fields for their nourishment was more befitting the Sabbath than the Pharisees’ many rules.

But this second statement from Jesus is a bombshell: “So the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath.”

In truth, were Jesus hoping to calm the situation, this was the worst thing He could have said! But Jesus was not after a façade calm. He was a proclaimer of the truth, no matter how jarring the truth might be. So He adds this as if it were a mere addendum. In fact, it was an atom bomb.

By calling Himself “Lord even of the Sabbath” Jesus was making the astonishing claim that He had the authority to define the Sabbath and Sabbath observation properly. But that was an authority that only God had, for God alone had instituted the Sabbath! What we recognize as a beautiful truth would have been seen by the Pharisees as outright blasphemy.

It is almost as if Jesus were saying, “Do not tell me how to understand my own day. I made the Sabbath.”

This is an amazing and jarring claim to deity. Meir Y. Soloveichik has pointed to Jacob Neusner’s consideration of our text in demonstrating that there was an even more shocking element present in Jesus’ words. In his book A Rabbi Talks With Jesus, Neusner interacts with the New Testament picture of Christ and ultimately rejects Christ. His reasons are interesting.

A central passage for Neusner’s discussion is Jesus’ defense of his violations of the Sabbath:

At that time Jesus went through the grain fields on the Sabbath; his disciples were hungry, and they began to pluck ears of grain and to eat. But when the Pharisees saw it, they said to him, “Look, your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath.” He said to them, “Have you not read in the law how on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath, and are guiltless? I tell you, something greater than the temple is here. And if you had known what this means, ‘I desire mercy, and not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the guiltless. For the son of man is lord of the Sabbath.”

Neusner notes that actions that are usually forbidden on the Sabbath, such as lighting fires, slaughtering, and cooking, were permitted in the Temple. Thus, Jesus’ argument is that he has replaced the Temple: “His claim, then, concerns not whether or not the Sabbath is to be sanctified, but where and what is the Temple, the place where things are done on the Sabbath that elsewhere are not to be done at all. Not only so, but just as on the Sabbath it is permitted to place on the altar the food that is offered up to God, so Jesus’ disciples are permitted to prepare their food on the Sabbath, again a stunning shift indeed.”

Neusner argues that Jesus is not a liberal Jew ­ seeking to ignore the rituals of the Torah; rather, he is claiming to be the dwelling place of the divine: “No wonder, then, that the son of man is lord of the Sabbath! The reason is not that he interprets the Sabbath restrictions in a liberal manner…Jesus was not just another reforming rabbi, out to make life ‘easier’ for people…No, the issue is not that the burden is light…Jesus’ claim to authority is at issue.”

Neusner imagines himself conversing with a disciple of Jesus: “Is it really so that your master, the son of man, is lord of the Sabbath? Then” so I asked before, so I ask again “is your master God?” Again and again, Neusner returns to this question. Both Jesus and the rabbinic sages, he argues, agree that the essence of life is imitation of God. Jews believe that the holy life is achieved via observance of the Torah, the sanctification of the mundane world by adhering to its many minutiae. For Jesus’ followers, their master is now the equivalent of God, of the Torah, and Jesus’ instructions focus less on whether grain can be picked on the Sabbath and more on entering the Kingdom of Heaven. As such, the holy life must be defined by following him.[7]

This certainly adds yet another layer to what is happening here! If food could be prepared only in the Temple on the Sabbath and Jesus said that food could be prepared with Him on the Sabbath, was Jesus not equating Himself with the Temple and therefore with the very presence of God? It is a stunning thought, but one that has merit. After all, did Jesus not do the same in John 2:19 when He said, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up”?

Christ is the Temple. Christ is God with us.

This means that the Pharisees’ fixation on the externals of religion and on their own legalisms had blinded them not only to the needs of suffering man but also to the glory of God Himself…a glory now unexpectedly displayed in the incarnate second person of the Trinity, Jesus.

No wonder they wanted Him dead.

But the point cannot merely be a historical point about the psychology of a religious sect in first century Palestine. The point is also that religion can do the very same to us. Like the Pharisees, we too can be lured into a kind of soul-coma by the soothing sights and sounds of religious ritual and by the rush of religious rule keeping. There is nothing quite so blinding as the destructive flash of our own self-righteousness and there is nothing that engenders self-righteousness quite like taking your place as the keeper of the gate and the guardian of the rules and there is no gate quite so intoxicating as the gate of religious observance.

Beware, Church, beware! It is possible to love your rituals for God more than you love God. It is possible to love your religion more than you love your heavenly Father. It is possible to be drunk on the wine of legalism and miss the very heart of the gospel!

Jesus did not come to establish a religion. He came to start a revolution, a revolution grounded not in the minutia of religious rules but grounded rather in the person of Jesus Himself.

Do not miss Jesus because you are so busy practicing your Jesus religion! Do not miss God in your efforts to honor God.

Christ is loose in the fields of the world and He has come to change the world forever! This will mean that the world will oftentimes not understand, it is true, but it will also mean that religious folk oftentimes will not understand either. At the end of the day, whether one is blinded by atheism or religion, they are still blind.

Set aside your petty legalisms and rituals and dare to look squarely in the face of the Lord of the Sabbath, the Author of the book, the Creator of the day, the Lord of the wheat and the world and the whole wide universe. Christ has come to set us free from sin, death, and hell…and, yes, even from our religious silliness.


[1] William Barclay, The Gospel of Mark. The Daily Study Bible. (Edinburgh: The Saint Andrew Press, 1971), p.57.

[2] Daniel Akin, Mark. Christ-Centered Exposition. (Nashville, TN: Holman Reference, 2014), p.60-61.

[3] Camille Focant, The Gospel According to Mark. Translated by Leslie Robert Keylcok (Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications, 2012), p.115.

[4] Philip Yancey. What’s So Amazing About Grace? (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1997), p.195.

[5] J.C. Ryle, Mark. The Crossway Classic Commentaries. (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1993), p.26.

[6] John R. Donahue, S.J. and Daniel J. Harrington, S.J. The Gospel of Mark. Sacra Pagina. Ed., Daniel J. Harrington, S.J. Vol. 2 (Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press, 2002), p.112.